Script

Only with your donations am I able to continue this blog. Please
consider donating.

Friday, December 30, 2011

Corporate Deal Leaves Residents Feeling Raw

`In "More Reasons to Hate the 1%", D.C.'s Zoning Commission will continue to hear testimony regarding a proposed deal between the city and corporate developers to sell three pieces of public property in the West End neighborhood of Ward 2 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 6:30p.m.  The deal would sell the land to the developer so they can build approximately 175 high-end million-dollar condominiums and luxury rentals.

The three given up are of particular interest as they are located in one of the city's oldest neighborhood. They are the firehouse, located on a lot at the corner of the 2300 block of M Street and a public library and police station located between the 2300 and 2400 blocks of L Street, NW. Here is the plan.



Why is this happening? Well the Deputy Mayor's Office on Economic Development (DMPED) said it had no more money for the firehouse and library. EastBanc came along to help build new ones if they can own the land from top to bottom the land. There was also the expectation EastBanc would provide the library and fire station services along with a promise to build 50 affordable house - it only makes up about eight percent of the new housing units - unites above the fire station. EastBanc will make an approximate profit of more than $100-million dollars.

This is a requirement based off a clause on the first page states "The District requires that any Offers to redevelop Square 37 include the replacement of the West End Neighborhood Library either on Square 37, on Square 50, or another site in the immediate neighborhood. Any Offers to redevelop Square 50 must include the replacement of the West End Fire Station either on Square 37, on Square 50, or another site in the immediate neighborhood. So it's perfectly clear that both sides realize this part of the deal is iron-clad. EastBanc itself states "it would designate affordable housing in its fire station project for the broader 'planned-unit development.' "

The residents lose the police station and the city's housing gap will expand due to the price of the condos being too high for students of George Washington University.  Understandably the residents are very angry about the deal.

Now here is where the trick comes into play. EastBanc, now past the DMPED, is asking DC's Zoning Commission if they can go through with their plan of building the expensive condos without providing the library, fire station, or affordable housing requirements presented on the first page of the deal.  What was their reaction? Take a look for yourself. Here are the legislation, terms sheet, land appraisals, and fiscal impacts.

For those living in or near the area, here is more information.

Hearing on the West End Parcels Deal (Part 2)
Thursday, Janurary 5, 2011
6:30PM start; 7:30 public testimony
D.C. Office of Zoning
441 4th Street NW, Second floor South

Send written testimony to:
Sharon.Schellin@DC.Gov
or DCSubmissions@dc.gov
or be there to testify in person.

Office of Zoning
(202)-727-0340
http://dcoz.dc.gov/main.shtm

Ambien Helps Man in Coma Awaken.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Police Stop Results in Death of Parolee




Albany, New York - Accusations of cold-blooded murder are being charged at two officers who killed a 19-year old man after a short struggle on the night of December 29th.

Police chief Steven Krokoff  opened a news conference about the subsequent event to the public, but within a short amount of time it became a shouting match.  One of the people, a woman, yelled "They're killing our kids" while City Council President Carolyn McLaughlin tried to get the crowd to calm down.



The victim, 19-year-old Nahcream Moore, was wanted for skipping parole. Police officers say while taking Moore into custody he saw him pick up a firearm while he fought with a police officer.

The driver of the SUV, 20-year-old Willisa Marshall, said she never saw Moore reach for a weapon of any kind.  Instead she said the officers "tussled" with him on the sidewalk as soon as he got out of the passenger side."

"He did what they asked and got out the car. And once he got out the car they tussled with him," Marshall said. "Two seconds later gunshots start going off." She said believes Moore was shot in the face while he was on the ground, but admits to not seeing it actually happen.  She added "They turned him over and shot him in the face.  I heard it and I knew it. That's where he was at when the shots when off. They brought him down to the ground.  I didn't see any gun and if he did have one, I'm sure he didn't approach them with it."


Marshall said about the stop, conducted by officers Jason Kelly and Gregory Mulligan, that "The police did not pull us over. We did not get chased by no police," Marshall said. "We was not even in motion. The car was not even in drive."


His friends say they don't believe he would've been armed with a gun and one of them said he believed there is a cover-up.


Jovaughn Morant, a friend of Moore's since he was 13, said about the incident "They're saying he did something wrong and they shot him." When asked if he thinks his friend had a gun, he answered "I want to see a gun."

Lawrence O'Donnell Knocks One Out of the Park

I haven't really watched mainstream news in a long time - sorry Rachel, Ed, and Lawrence I love you but I find what you guys don't cover to be pretty important too - but things like this make me want to do so.  I will let Lawrence himself say the words for me.  This needs to be taken to heart with ALL police stations not just now, when the heat is on them, but forever and globally.



However these words must not just go for the press, but for ordinary citizens. By taping the actions of the police they are able to make sure the police do not violate anyone's rights yet not interfere with their job.  They also document the officers who do go beyond that line and start their own crimes.

Ever since the Rodney King beating was taped there have been laws put into place stating it is against the law to tape police officials. In the areas where this has not been the case, the police instead lie to civilians and tell them they are not allowed to do it despite the fact recording police is a sometimes the only way to make sure they don't go outside their boundaries.

If it wasn't  for taped events like the Rodney King beating, the police intimidation in Miami on Memorial Day earlier this year,  or the execution of Oscar Grant (and it WAS an execution), people would be less likely to believe these events happen.  One of the many things the Occupy Movement has brought to light, and they are many, is that police as a whole have no problem trying to stop people from recording what they're doing.  Now the ball is in the court of the police everywhere.  Stop preventing people from taping you whether they're press or civilian.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

South Dakota Bar Owner Charged with Raping Three Girls


Huron, South Dakota- 34 year old bar owner Werner Fajardo was arrested for raping 3 girls at his El Cuervo bar on an early Saturday morning. The girls, two of which are 14 and the third 12, were supposed to be babysitting when they met up with Fajardo who drove them to his closed tavern and began pouring up drinks ranging from vodka shots to mixed drinks involving vodka and orange juice, cola, and energy drinks. After several rounds of drinks two of the girls felt sick and all three exclaimed that they either passed out or went to sleep.

According to prosecutors, this was when Fajardo raped them. Fajardo was charged with six counts of rape and three counts of serving alcohol to a minor to which he posted a $10,000.00 bond on. Approximately a week later, police authorities conducted their first alcohol compliance check to which 11 minors were found within the bar. Due to the discovery, Fajardo was once again arrested for five counts of furnishing alcohol to a minor and allowing people under age 21 on the premises to which a $150,000.00 bond was set. "Obviously we were missing some things. Whether or not it could have been caught with compliance checks at El Cuervo, we'll never know," stated Beadle County's state's attorney, Michael R. Moore.

El Cuervo, the only business licensed as a "dance-hall" in Huron, was known for weekly signs advertising a "teen night". It was at these teen nights that Fajardo met his victims, says Moore. Upon mentioning the alleged rape to their parents, and the parents to the Huron Police Department (HPD), several other victims arose with similar stories as to how they were coerced into drinking until they passed out and shortly thereafter recalled different sexually inappropriate acts from Fajardo. None of the victims were aware of each other's particular story, only the allegations.

"I questioned how they were able to have teen night in a bar. We saw teenagers go in and out," said Sheila Moore, manager of Homecare Services, an independent living establishment next door to El Cuervo.
Fajardo's bar had been exploiting an expired ordinance that allowed 18 to 21 year old's to congregate at the bar as long as it was designated as a dance hall. After applying in June 2010 for the dance hall license, the city permitted, and the effects took place two months thereafter. Not long following, Huron City repealed the license, yet Fajardo still welcomed minors.

Huron City Police stated that prior to Fajardo's charges and investigation, they had never suspected any illegal acts taking place within the bar and have since began to increase police presence at other local bars. "Obviously we were missing some things. Whether or not it could have been caught with compliance checks at El Cuervo, we'll never know," said Sgt. Brandon Neitzert, spokesman for the HPD.

Fajardo has not publicly discussed his cases, but plead not guilty to all charges and requested both cases be jury trials during his arraignment on Dec. 20. The Sioux Falls resident has been charged with first-degree and third-degree rape in his alleged attack on the 12 year old and several counts of third-degree rape and fourth-degree rape for each of his alleged attacks on the 14 year old's. Fajardo also faces a "sexual contact with a person incapable of consenting and exploitation of a minor" for alleged attacks in Sept. of 2011. His trial consisting of six rape chages, several sexual assault charges, and furnishing alcohol to minors is set for March 28 wheras he'll be tried on a beverage law violation on Feb. 23. If convicted on the more serious charges, Fajardo faces life imprisonment. All attempts made to contact Fajardo's attorney have come up dead ends.

US special forces in Central Africa on the hunt for Joseph Kony

Joseph Kony

Central African Republic- After decades of tyranny on the people of Uganda and other central African countries, Joseph Kony (pictured above) has become a target by 100 special forces sent into Uganda by Obama in October of 2011 to stand trial for acts against humanity. The majority of the troops are stationed in Uganda with others stationed in jungle villages within neighboring countries advising military forces on how to go about tracking the illusive Joseph Kony and rebels of the Lord's Resistance Army.

With the alleged mission of overthrowing the Ugandan government, the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) has been, for the most part, a force of evil. Displaying zero remorse or compassion, the LRA has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of civilians (from babies to elders) with more than 2,000,000 displaced to refugee camps since Kony became it's leader in the early 1980's. The rebel force consists of some supposed hundreds of fighters whose core consists of malicious ranks known for mutilating the innocent, kidnapping young girls and boys for soldiers/sex slaves, & destroying any building or structure (churches, schools, stores, etc) at the village they just invaded. Amongst the ranks, the LRA have become infamous for having child rebel soldiers, most of which were abducted from their villages and forced to fight for the movement's lost cause, some of which as young as 10. In select areas, the LRA have viciously massacred the inhabitants and blamed either the government or the civilians for their heartless acts. In doing such acts, the LRA hopes to make it appear as if Uganda and other nations of Africa have lacking governments that cannot protect or support their people.

Over time, the LRA's leadership dropped the mission of overthrowing the Ugandan government and focused on reigning terror. Through inhumane acts, the LRA proved to be a nefarious terrorist organization, rather than past members of the Acholi ethnic group.

Frustrations with the government following colonization by the British led to a revolutionary militant force seeking fair treatment (by violent means) to those of S. Uganda. When colonized, the people of S. Uganda were met with peace and a friendly British party, yet the people of N. Uganda, known as the Acholi, were enslaved. Years of civil war ensued in Uganda due to such disunity and further spaced any possibility of a peaceful resolution to the conflicts between the Ugandan government and the LRA.

With supposed ally Sudan providing funds, weaponry, etc. to support the LRA's bloodthirsty campaign, a total of four nations have joined the fight along with U.S. special forces in a complex and very dedicated mission to rid the region of the LRA and capture Joseph Kony and the other leaders so they can face their charges in International Criminal Court Alliance.


Bird Flu Slightly Modified.

Netherlands - Scientists in the Netherlands have tinkered around with the H5N1 virus, more commonly known as bird flu. With just a “handful” of alterations made to the virus, it can now be passed to animals through the air. Scientists warn that if the virus gets out and can alter once again to spread from animal to human, and then from human to human, it will be the deadliest pandemic known in history.

Dr. Ron Fouchier


Dr. Ron Fouchier, a virologist at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, said "What shocked the researchers was how easy it had been. Just a few mutations was all it took to make the virus go airborne.

This is the same virus they changed that I mentioned last week.  In that piece, I made mention of the fact the U.S. government asked the scientists taking part in the research not to divulge the details.  The request was made so that "hostile governments or rogue scientists" won't use it for malicious intentions.

Despite the fact they usually resist censorship of any kind, journal editors say they're taking the request seriously.  Scientists with the project are also following the government's recommendation out of fear of terrorist actions, citing the information is too dangerous to share.

Biosecurity experts expressed the idea just creating the modified virus should not have been allowed, as its original form is already pretty deadly.  They worry the virus may somehow spread from the laboratory or be stolen.
 
The bird flu It already causes the exceptionally high death rate of more than 50 percent n humans.  The only thing stopping it from becoming a worldwide pandemic is that it doesn't often infect people.  In the few cases when it does happen it almost never transmits to another person.

Tucson Orders Closure of Mexican-American School Program as Ethnic Studies Faces Nationwide Threat


I can see this as nothing more than a racist attack against the Latin/Chicano/Mexican people as a whole.  To act like this kind of thing is a bad subject to learn, under the intentionally misleading guise that it causes division amongst people, is disgusting.

In schools across the country history, especially American history, is usually seen through the eyes of white people.  Whether that is the celebration of Christopher Columbus, the lionizing of the Founding Fathers, the slight mention of white supremacists, or the just-barely-enough history of the Civil Rights Era, American schools have taught its students white history as if it was universal fact.

Along comes, however, something like this or the role the LGBT community in the United States and what happens? People, mostly older white people, get upset.  I assure you if they knew they could get away with it, these very same people would, nation-wide, try to get African-American history yanked out of schools as well.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Book Examines America's Turn from Science, Warns of Danger for Democracy by Renee Schoof



WASHINGTON — Americans have trouble dealing with science, and one place that's especially obvious is in presidential campaigns, says Shawn Lawrence Otto, who tried, with limited success, to get the candidates to debate scientific questions in the 2008 presidential election.

Otto is the author of a new book, "Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America," which opens with a quote from Thomas Jefferson: "Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government."
And if the people and their leaders aren't well informed and don't use scientific information to solve modern problems, Otto suggests, the United States could soon skid into decline.
"Without the mooring provided by the well-informed opinion of the people, governments may become paralyzed or, worse, corrupted by powerful interests seeking to oppress and enslave," he writes.
Today, he adds, Congress seems paralyzed and "ideology and rhetoric increasingly guide policy discussion, often bearing little relationship to factual reality."
In 2008, Otto and a group of other writers tried to organize a presidential debate on science issues. Neither Barack Obama nor John McCain was interested. In the end, the two candidates agreed to respond to 14 questions in writing, and Otto's group posted them on its ScienceDebate.org website.
Otto said the group plans to try for another science debate in 2012.

Reporters play a role in whether science is discussed in campaigns. A League of Conservation Voters analysis in early 2008 found that prime-time TV journalists asked 2,975 questions in 171 interviews. Only six questions were about climate change, "and the same could be said of any one of several major policy topoics surrounding science," Otto writes in the book.
Today's policymakers "are increasingly unwilling to pursue many of the remedies science presents," he argues. They "take one of two routes: Deny the science, or pretend the problems don't exist."
Otto said he wasn't looking for simple answers in the book:
"I don't blame corporations because they are stuck in a system we have created and they can't solve it all themselves," he said in an interview. "I don't blame the Republican Party for going anti-science because there are a lot of factors that led to that socially, and I don't think it's a decision of Republican Party leadership to one day say, 'oh, we're not going to accept science anymore.' And it's not just because evangelicals got involved in politics. There's a lot of compex reasons."

Here are some questions with the author and his answers:
- Are Americans rejecting science?
"I think it's a myth Americans aren't interested. It's a myth they don't like science and scientists ... But there's some partisan political affiliation going on, and sometimes science tells them they don't want to hear and they don't like to deal with. Climate change is a great example, because the problem is so enormous and the implications mean restructuring our economy and our energy supply system."
"Science does two things that we don't love. It does lots of things that we do love, but the two things we don't love are: Whenever we extend our knowledge, we have to parse that new knowledge morally and ethically . . . . The other thing is that it either confirms or vexes somebody's vested interested."
- Will we hear about science issues in the 2012 campaign?
"I think science is going to remain a charged issue . .. Science is such a major part of everything, but particularly our unsolved challenges."
On climate change, Republican presidential candidates generally say they don't think the science is settled, even though the nation's scientific organizations have reported a consensus view that the Earth is warming mostly as a result of pollution from fossil fuel combustion.
Things could change after the primaries, when the eventual candidate appeals for swing voters and tries to avoid an anti-science label, Otto said.
The Obama administration accepts the scientific understanding of climate change, but rarely mentions it, stressing instead ways that clean energy could create jobs and boost competitiveness.

- What makes dealing with climate change so difficult?
"Nobody wants to feel bad about the future. Everybody wants to be hopeful."
The nation was settled by "insanely hopeful immigrants," Otto said, and Americans still have a strong sense of opportunity, including the idea that hard work pays off and that people get what they deserve.
"It doesn't mean that we're bad or stupid. It just means that it's just hard. It's hard to get our minds around and embrace, because it means maybe we've screwed up somehow and nobody wants to feel that way. But the great thing about Americans is that because of that hopefulness, once we get through this painful process of self-reflection ... then we really kick it in and we can solve problems like nobody else."

Police Say Three Deaths Tied to Dating Services Site




Detroit - Three women discovered dead in Detroit over the past week, including two found burned beyond recognition early on Christmas, were linked to a website called Packages that advertises adult escort services, police said on Monday.
 
In two incidents over the last week, four women -- all African-Americans in their 20s -- have been found dead in the trunks of abandoned vehicles on Detroit's east side.

The latest incident occurred about 1 a.m. on Sunday, when the Detroit Fire Department responded to reports of a car fire.

After putting out the flames, firefighters discovered two dead women in the trunk of the 1997 Buick LaSabre.

Three of the four women, the police said in a statement, were linked with "prearranged adult dating services" advertised on Packages, police said.

In a statement posted on the department's Facebook page, Detroit Police Chief Ralph Godbee Jr. said "deciding to meet unknown persons via the Internet can be extremely dangerous."

The city's medical examiner has not determined how the four women died. But Godbee said that given "the way the females were found and the attempt to hide their bodies," homicide detectives were treating the cases as suspicious deaths.

Utah Doctors Join "Occupy" Movement by Brian Moench

Utah's Bingham Canyon mine
Utah - Taking inspiration from the Occupy Movement, last week a group of doctors and environmental groups in Salt Lake City, Utah announced a law suit against the third largest mining corporation in the world, Rio Tinto, for violating the Clean Air Act in Utah. This is likely the first time ever that physicians have sued industry for harming public health.

Air pollution causes between 1,000 and 2,000 premature deaths every year in Utah. Moreover, medical research in the last ten years has firmly established that air pollution causes the same broad array of diseases well known to result from first and second hand cigarette smoke--strokes, heart attacks, high blood pressure, virtually every kind of lung disease, neurologic diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, loss of intelligence, chromosomal damage, higher rates of diabetes, obesity, adverse birth outcomes and various cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer and leukemia.


Most of Utah’s cities are in violation of many of the EPA's national air quality standards, and for several days during a typical winter Utah is plagued by the worst air pollution in the country. The American Lung Association routinely gives Utah’s largest cities an “F” for our air quality. Last February, Forbes magazine, hardly a cheerleader for excessive environmental protection, rated Salt Lake City as the nineth most toxic city in the country, and the biggest contributor to that ranking was the mining and smelting operations at the Bingham Canyon mine, run by London-based mining conglomerate Rio Tinto/Kennecott (RTK).

This mine is the world’s largest man made excavation and has created the largest mining related water pollution problem in the world. The mine is located on the western doorstep of Salt Lake City, home to well over one million people. There is no comparable juxtaposition of an enormous mining operation this close to such a large urban center. RTK's mine and smelter operations account for 30% of the particulate matter emitted into the atmosphere over Salt Lake County, making it by far the largest source of industrial pollution in the urban areas of Utah.

The smelting operations and fugitive dust from the 1,100 foot high waste rock piles and tailings ponds are a constant source of highly toxic heavy metal contamination--lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium-- to the air, water, and soil of Utah’s largest city. The mining industry watchdog, Earthworks, states that before the most recently approved expansion, RTK was releasing 695 million pounds of toxic material into the Salt Lake City environment every year. Because heavy metals do not degrade, are not combustible and cannot be destroyed, that heavy metal toxic burden steadily increases year after year, as it has for over 100 years.

Despite this extreme burden on public health, predictably, the Utah Division of Air Quality recently issued a permit for RTK to expand their operations by 32% which will make their pollution emissions even worse.
RTK is making record profits--$15 billion last year. In August Chairman of the Board, Jan du Plessis bragged, “Rio Tinto has produced another set of record breaking results.” du Plesses apparently specializes in delivering pollution, he is also chairman of the Board of British American Tobacco. Tom Albanese, Rio Tinto’s CEO who made almost $8.5 million in compensation last year, recently lamented, “[Rio Tinto must do] a better job at managing the curse of resource nationalism... and the activism of stakeholder engagement.” Let me translate that for you: local people throughout the world are tired of being exploited for profit, they're starting to stand up for themselves, and Rio Tinto doesn't like it. Utah citizens tired of RTK’s pollution would be considered part of that “curse” to Rio Tinto executives.

This issue is simple: RTK can well afford to clean up, but they won’t, and no one is making them. Their contribution to our pollution is hurting all the residents of Salt Lake City and adding to the premature death total mentioned above. For environmental and public health advocates, RTK pursuing and receiving an approval to expand was “the last straw.”

If the core tenet of the Occupy Movement is that corporations and the 1% manipulate every level of government to serve their profit driven agendas and simultaneously disregard, if not openly undermine, the interests of the 99%, then there is no better example than RTK’s operation of Utah’s Bingham Canyon mine.
UPHE estimates that the mortality, health and environmental costs to the community from RTK pollution is between $2 billion and $4 billion, several times the value of the wages and taxes that they pay. Nonetheless, a massive PR budget allows RTK to heavily advertise themselves as “job providers”, and take virtually no responsibility for the various environmental and health consequences of their operations.

Frederick Douglass, the19th century civil rights leader, said,"Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them." Let it be known that the people in Utah will no longer “quietly submit” to more pollution, more deaths, shortened life spans and poorer health to fatten the wallets in the London board room of Rio Tinto. We are going to “take back” the air we breathe

State Cuts to Medicaid Affect Patients, Providers



— Just as Medicaid prepares for a vast expansion under the federal health care overhaul, the 47-year-old entitlement program for the poor is under increasing pressure as deficit-burdened states chip away at benefits and cut payments to doctors.
Nearly every state has proposed or implemented a plan in its current budget to rein in costs, and many are considering additional cuts in the year ahead.

For the tens of millions of poor and disabled who rely on the program — approaching nearly one in five Americans — the cuts translate into longer waits for doctors, restrictions on prescription drugs, a halt to vision and dental care, staff cuts at nursing homes and dwindling access to home health care.

Ruth Wohlforth, 70, is among those feeling the effects.

Her $700 monthly income qualifies her for both Medicare and Medicaid, but she says her benefits have been reduced, she's being forced her to make co-pays for the first time on prescription drugs, and she now has to drive about 30 minutes from her home near the southern tip of New Jersey to see a doctor. Some of her friends have been assigned to doctors in Philadelphia. 

She said she feels lawmakers are not aware of the real-world consequences of their spending cuts.
"I've seen so many people in tears, and they don't know what to do," Wohlforth said. "People that are older than I am, and are in worse shape, they get befuddled by the whole thing. They don't know where to go for help; they just feel they're not being listened to."
States are reshaping the Medicaid landscape even as the need has grown along with joblessness during the recession.

The $427 billion-a-year program, a combination of state and federal funding, also had been targeted for additional cuts at the federal level this year as members of Congress sparred over how to reduce the nation's debt. But funding seems safe for now after a special committee failed last month to reach an agreement on how to cut overall spending.

Already, many changes at the state level have been dramatic and are testing the legal bounds of what Medicaid must provide:

— Arizona, for a time, eliminated life-saving transplants for Medicaid patients, and hospital officials in the state blame at least one death on the halt in coverage. Gov. Jan Brewer restored transplants but is prohibiting thousands of low-income, childless adults from entering the program and has added fees on those who smoke and the obese.

— New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is pushing a plan under which only the poorest would qualify. A parent of two making more than $103 per week would no longer be eligible for coverage.

— The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether California has the right to continue cutting payments to physicians and other Medicaid providers to help close the state's ongoing budget deficit.

Cuts to provider fees, as in California, have been the most frequently used tactic by states to save Medicaid costs. A recent survey by the National Association of State Budget Officers found that 33 states wanted to reduce provider rates and another 16 sought to freeze them.
California was granted permission by federal officials to make broad cuts to reimbursement rates to its Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, in October. The cuts include a 10 percent reduction to payments for outpatient services for doctors, clinics, optometrists, dental services, medical equipment and pharmacy. They are intended to save the state an estimated $623 million.

A coalition of trade associations representing doctors, pharmacists and chain drug stores has filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the cuts. Doctors who care for Medi-Cal patients say they already have been subjected to multiple pay cuts, and some say they no longer will be able to serve the state's neediest patients.

About 70 percent of Dr. Douglas Tolley's practice in Yuba County is covered by Medi-Cal. The 64-year-old obstetrician, who practices in a largely agricultural region about 40 minutes north of the state capital, said he is the old-school sort of doctor who "was brought up in a time when doctors took care of all comers."

Yet he has seen his income steadily drop over the last 18 years — down one-third from what it was when he started.

"Everybody understands that doctors are basically small business people, and we have to meet our cost plus make a living." Tolley said. "Just meeting our cost doesn't mean staying in business."

Even more state cuts could be on the horizon. In Maine, Gov. Paul LePage recently proposed removing 65,000 residents from the program, citing a state Medicaid shortfall estimated to reach $221 million through mid-2013. The Republican governor says he will not consider tax increases to make up the difference.

State officials, who are required to balance their budgets, argue they have no choice but to cut into Medicaid after four straight years of budget deficits. With state and federal funds combined, Medicaid makes up 22 percent of total state spending, the largest single portion of most state budgets, according to the National Association of State Budget Officers.

Critics say the moves are shortsighted.

Joan Alker, co-executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University, said slashing Medicaid will not stop the sick from seeking care, sending them to emergency rooms and ultimately inflating private medical insurance premiums.
"At the end of the day, for the children, the individuals with disabilities, the seniors in nursing homes, their health care needs are not going to go away just because someone cuts the Medicaid program," Alker said.

Jerry Kemmer, a former Democratic state assemblyman in New York, said Medicaid has long been an issue lawmakers did not want to touch. Now, they simply have no choice.

"It's ballooned to the extent that it's just become a budget-buster," he said.

Six million people have joined the Medicaid rolls since the recession began in late 2007. Enrollment nationally topped 50 million for the first time in June 2010, a number that is projected to keep rising, especially as the nation's unemployment rate remains high.
Billions of dollars from the federal stimulus program helped avoid deep Medicaid cuts through the worst of the recession, but the last of that money dried up this year.

In Florida, Medicaid reimbursement rates were reduced this year by 12 percent for most hospitals, although rural and children's hospitals were cut just 3 percent, and rates for nursing homes were cut 6.5 percent.

But the start of the next legislative session in January already has some people worried about additional cuts.
Debra St. Fleur, 25, of Miami, is covered by Medicaid, along with her 1-year-old son. Many of her neighbors in the city's Little Haiti section are on Medicaid, too, and she worries what would happen if services continue to be eroded.

"It's really scary," she said. "If they can't get their medicine, what's going to happen? They're going to die."
The Obama administration is concerned enough about the widespread Medicaid provider cuts that it has introduced a rule that would make it harder for states to slash the rates. The move is designed to ensure that those eligible for Medicaid are not denied access due to a shortage of 
health care resources.

Medicaid reimbursement rates already trail those physicians receive for treating Medicare patients and those with private insurance. A study by the nonpartisan Center for Studying Health System Change found that on, average, Medicaid would reimburse a doctor $39 for 45 minutes for a new patient hospital visit, compared to $63 for Medicare.

Physician groups say that has left more and more doctors declining to see Medicaid clients. Some providers are trying to find other ways to make up for the cuts.

In Columbia, S.C., Julie Ann Avin, executive director of the private, nonprofit Mental Illness Recovery Center Inc., has decided not to fill staff vacancies and also cut back on some rehab services because of Medicaid's new authorization process. The center serves about 650 people annually, close to 60 percent of whom are on Medicaid.

"We accept folks regardless," Avin said. "Everything that we do is not based just on a reimbursement."
Molly Collins Offner, director of policy development for the American Hospital Association, said emergency rooms must accept Medicaid clients, as well as those without insurance.
 "More and more, you are seeing ER's becoming primary care docs," she said.
She said deep cuts rippling through the Medicaid system will only exacerbate that.

TV Producer Won't Fight Extradition to Mexico

— A reality show producer charged with murdering his wife during a Mexican vacation is dropping his extradition fight and will stand trial in Cancun, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Bruce Beresford-Redman's attorney said the onetime "Survivor" producer has decided not to appeal a Los Angeles federal court ruling upholding his extradition to Mexico.

"He feels he is not going to prevail on appeal and he'd like to get moving on proving his innocence," said attorney Richard Hirsch.
He said the producer could be sent to Mexico within 60 days following review of the extradition request by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Beresford-Redman, 40, is being held in a Los Angeles federal prison.

Monica Beresford-Redman, 42, disappeared from a Cancun resort where the couple was vacationing with their two children last year. Her body was found stuffed in a sewer cistern.
"He is innocent and it is his hope that the court in Mexico will assure that he receives a fair trial in which, he is confident, he will be exonerated," Hirsch said.

The family of Monica Beresford-Redman has said the couple went to Cancun to try to save their marriage. They claim Bruce Beresford-Redman, who is also the co-creator of the series "Pimp My Ride," was having a long-term affair with another woman. His wife, originally from Brazil, owned and operated a restaurant in Los Angeles.

U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez upheld an extradition order earlier this month, saying that there are many pages of competent evidence supporting prosecution claims that the producer killed his wife.
"All of this evidence points to homicide committed by the fugitive," said the judge's ruling.

Prosecutors presented statements from hotel guests who said they heard loud arguing and cries of distress coming from the couple's room on the night Monica Beresford-Redman went missing.

The producer's attorneys have claimed the noises came from Beresford-Redman and his children playing loud games throughout the night. They introduced statements from the couple's 6-year-old daughter to corroborate the claim, but judges who have reviewed the case were not swayed.

Beresford-Redman had been ordered to stay in Mexico after his wife's body was found but he left and returned to his home in Los Angeles. He voluntarily surrendered to U.S. authorities after a warrant was issued in Mexico for his arrest.

Hirsch said that Beresford-Redman's family has been in contact with a Mexican lawyer who will represent him at trial. Mexican courts do not have juries, and the producer will be tried by the same judge who issued the warrant for his arrest, Hirsch said.
If he is convicted of aggravated homicide in Mexico, he faces 12 years to 30 years in a Mexican prison.
His two small children have been placed in the custody of Beresford-Redman's parents with visitation by their mother's sisters.

New Fee Coming for Medical Effectiveness Research

WASHINGTON — Starting in 2012, the government will charge a new fee to your health insurance plan for research to find out which drugs, medical procedures, tests and treatments work best. But what will Americans do with the answers?

The goal of the research, part of a little-known provision of President Barack Obama's health care law, is to answer such basic questions as whether that new prescription drug advertised on TV really works better than an old generic costing much less.

But in the politically charged environment surrounding health care, the idea of medical effectiveness research is eyed with suspicion. The insurance fee could be branded a tax and drawn into the vortex of election-year politics.

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute — a quasi-governmental agency created by Congress to carry out the research — has yet to commission a single head-to-head comparison, although its director is anxious to begin.

The government is already providing the institute with some funding: The $1-per-person insurance fee goes into effect in 2012. But the Treasury Department says it's not likely to be collected for another year, though insurers would still owe the money. The fee doubles to $2 per covered person in its second year and thereafter rises with inflation. The IRS is expected to issue guidance to insurers within the next six months.

"The more concerning thing is not the institute itself, but how the findings will be used in other areas," said Kathryn Nix, a policy analyst for the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank. "Will they be used to make coverage determinations?"
 The institute's director, Dr. Joe Selby, said patients and doctors will make the decisions, not his organization.

"We are not a policy-making body; our role is to make the evidence available," said Selby, a primary care physician and medical researcher,
But insurance industry representatives say they expect to use the research and work with employers to fine-tune workplace health plans. Employees and family members could be steered to hospitals and doctors who follow the most effective treatment methods. Patients going elsewhere could face higher copayments, similar to added charges they now pay for "non-preferred" drugs on their insurance plans.

Major insurers already are carrying out their own effectiveness research, but it lacks the credibility of government-sponsored studies.
Not long ago, so-called "comparative effectiveness" research enjoyed support from lawmakers in both parties. After all, much of the medical research that doctors and consumers rely on now is financed by drug companies and medical device manufacturers, who have a built-in interest in the findings. And a drug maker only has to show that a new medicine is more effective than a sugar pill — not a competing medication — to win government approval for marketing.

The 2009 economic stimulus bill included $1.1 billion for medical effectiveness research, mainly through the National Institutes of Health. It was not considered particularly controversial. But things changed during the congressional health care debate, after former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin made the claim, now widely debunked, that Obama and the Democrats were setting up "death panels" to ration care.

As a result, lawmakers hedged the new institute with caveats. It was set up as an independent nonprofit organization, with a .org Internet address instead of .gov. The government cannot dictate Selby's research agenda. And there are limitations on how the Health and Human Services department can use the research findings in decisions that affect Medicare and Medicaid.

Selby says the institute is taking seriously the term "patient-centered" in its name. Patients will not be merely subjects of research; they and their representatives will be involved in setting the agenda and overseeing the process.

"We are talking about patients as partners in the research," said Selby. Findings will be presented in clear language — a kind of Consumer Reports approach — so that patients and doctors can easily draw on them to make decisions.

"Our goal, our hope, is that over time, by involving patients in research, two things will happen," said Selby. "One is that we will start asking questions in a more practical fashion, so the results would speak more consistently to questions that patients want to know the answers to. And two is that, by our example of involving patients in the research, trust will rise." He expects to unveil the institute's proposed research agenda in the next few weeks.
Former Medicare administrator Gail Wilensky says that agenda should focus on high-cost procedures and drugs on which the medical community has not developed a consensus, and which have widely different patterns of use around the country. A Republican, Wilensky believes opposition to the institute's work is shortsighted.
"This just strikes me as a component of finding ways to treat better and spend smarter," she said.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Gunman in Massacre Dressed as Santa

Grapevine, Texas - The city of Grapevine's first murder in more than a year - the last one took place in July 2010 - also turned out to be its "most heinous gun crime" in the city's history according to a Grapevine police officer.

Police Sergeant Robert Eberling said the shooter, dressed in a Santa outfit, was one of the older males of the six victims of the incident.  He added details are sketchy and will be released after the victims are identified and their family members are contacted but it happened during a family celebration.


A 911 call seems to have been made just before the deaths, but the caller never spoke to anyone and police say they didn't see the phone when they arrived on the scene.  They say the family appeared to be opening presents when it happened and there was no struggle or sign of forced entry.  They are all from the same family.

Raw Story's Blatant Hit Job



The Raw Story released an article in which they claim "Less than two days after police cracked down on Occupy Albany in a violent raid, apparently anti-capitalist vandals went after a holiday display in Washington Park."  This alone rang out to me to be an obvious hit piece.  For them to even imply they had anything to do with it would be journalistic malfeasance.  Do they mean to tell people they aren't able to get to the bottom of who actually did it before they put it on the internet? Why didn't any of the editors, who should be reading over each and every article, sit on Megan Carpentier's piece until more information was available?

In the slightly more than three months since Occupy Wall Street has been around there have been no shows of violence from any of the groups in spite of the fact they were justified in doing so more than a few times.  However, they not only didn't take violent action against the city, police, media, or other figures who obviously had it out for them, they also stopped people from fighting back against the cops. What in the world would make anyone, much less Raw Story, think to imply this act was done by Occupy Albany?

Bad reporting on your end Raw Story.  It makes one wonder what else is newsworthy or true.

Update: Here's the video.



Another update: Raw Story states authorities in Albany say there's no link between the protesters and the vandalism.