Script

Only with your donations am I able to continue this blog. Please
consider donating.
Showing posts with label Noel Brinkerhoff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Noel Brinkerhoff. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Brazil Refuses to Allow 17 American Executives to Leave Country Over OIl Spill


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky
Brazil - Chevron and another American company are under attack from the government of Brazil after allowing an oil leak from an offshore well.
Seventeen executives from Chevron and oil platform operator Transocean face criminal charges for an oil discharge, about 110,000 gallons, which occurred last November. The equivalent of about 3,000 barrels, it so far pales in comparison to the 4 million-barrel BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. Transocean was also held partially responsible for that disaster.
The 17 include George Buck, chief operating officer for Chevron’s Brazilian division. Buck and the others have been told by Brazilian prosecutors to turn over their passports and remain in the country.
When more oil was spotted in the water on Friday near the original leak, Chevron agreed to suspend production, which had been turning out more than 60,000 barrels of oil a day, even after the November incident.
Prosecutors also have filed a civil lawsuit seeking $11.2 billion in damages from Chevron, which has accused the government of overreacting to the size of the spill. Prosecutor Eduardo Santos de Oliveira told Reuters that Chevron executives may face criminal charges for drilling in an unsafe location or an unsafe manner.

Opposition Grows to Obama's Refusal to Reveal Secret Patriot Powers


 By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - Congressional Democrats, the media and civil libertarians are continuing their fight with President Barack Obama over his administration’s secret interpretations of the Patriot Act.
 
Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado, who sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder last week claiming a classified intelligence operation based on the Patriot Act interpretation is not as critical to national security as the administration says.
 
Wyden and Udall also wrote that Americans would be “stunned” if they knew what the government was really doing based on the legal theory being employed through the Patriot Act. In October, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) said that the government’s use of “Section 215 is unfortunately cloaked in secrecy. Some day that cloak will be lifted, and future generations will ask whether our actions today meet the test of a democratic society: transparency, accountability, and fidelity to the rule of law and our Constitution.”
 
The Department of Justice has insisted that revealing anything about the secret spy program could “cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the United States.”
 
Federal lawyers are trying to dismiss two lawsuits, one by The New York Times and the other by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, that seek to force the administration into disclosing how the Patriot Act has been interpreted.

Nation's Biggest Spy Center Settles into Utah


By David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Utah - Officially called the Utah Data Center, the enormous facility under construction will eventually house one million square feet of computers. Its mission will be to intercept, decipher, analyze and store large volumes of communications collected by the NSA from around the world.
 
Everything from private emails to cell phone calls to Google searches and more will be stored at the center, which is scheduled to operational in September 2013. It will also collect the details of financial transactions, big and small, secret communication of foreign governments, suspected terrorists and, perhaps, just about everybody else.
 
“It is, in some measure, the realization of the ‘total information awareness’ program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy,” according to James Bamford in an excellent article in Wired. Bush went ahead anyway, enlisting the aid of the telecoms, and the Obama administration has moved the strategy forward.
 
The Utah Data Center will also be a center for cryptanalysis—code breaking—since one of its primary targets will be password-protected and intricately encrypted information.
 
The Data Center is expected to have at least 200 full-time employees and cost $40 million a year to maintain.

Friday, March 16, 2012

JPMorgan Chase Caught “Misrepresenting” Credit Card Collections; Whistleblower Fired


By David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff
 
San Antonio - After cutting corners and relying on poor accounting, JPMorgan Chase shut down its legal operation against credit card debtors, some of whom may have been wrongly sued by the bank. It would appear to be another example of greed overcoming honesty. Ten years ago, Chase was recovering about $130 million a year in bad debt collections. By 2009, they were raking in $1.2 billion on credit card recoveries alone. The problem, legally and ethically, was that Chase was misrepresenting what they were selling to professional debt collectors. The increase in profits—and the decrease in ethical standards—would appear to have begun in 2008 when Edmond Helaire and his right-hand man, Jason Lazinbat, were put in charge of the credit card debt division in San Antonio, Texas.
 
A former bank employee, Linda Almonte, first drew attention to the problem after she was fired for complaining that Chase was selling credit cards debts with erroneous balances to collection companies. Almonte then filed a whistleblower lawsuit contending she was wrongfully terminated.
 
Almonte had barely settled into her new job at Chase’s credit card litigation support section in San Antonio in 2009 when she was given responsibility for organizing a parcel of almost $200 million worth of delinquent credit card bills to be sold to a debt collector. It did not take long for her to realize that many of the unpaid bills, or judgments, were not what they were supposed to be. She wrote to her superiors that almost half of the judgments were missing documents or lacked dates and signatures. In addition, for almost a quarter of the judgments, Chase was exaggerating the amount that was owed.
 
Another former bank employee, Howard Hardin, who oversaw a team handling tens of thousands of debt files, backed up Almonte’s story, telling American Banker his division “did not verify a single one” of the affidavits attesting to the amounts that the bank was seeking to collect. “We were told [by superiors] ‘We’re in a hurry. Go ahead and sign them,’” he said.
 
The revelations prompted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to launch an investigation. Chase also has stopped suing delinquent borrowers for the time being.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Drug Companies Still Outsourcing Dangerous Trials to Poor Nations

By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky
Worldwide - Despite getting into trouble in Africa, U.S. drug manufacturers are still going overseas, with increasing frequency, to test new medicines and take advantage of poor economic conditions…and lax regulation legal responsibility should anything go wrong.
India is one popular destination for pharmaceutical companies wanting to avoid tougher regulatory guidelines for using test subjects in the U.S.
And getting volunteers is easy when so many Indians live in poverty.
In a nation where the average worker makes 50 cents a day, pharmaceutical corporations can offer $400 to participants in drug trials.
“Whether the studies are for birth control, diabetes, migraines or high blood pressure, money often draws volunteers into Indian drug trials,” reports NBC’s Dateline.
But paying locals what amounts to huge sums of cash is a violation of India’s Drugs and Cosmetics Act, said Dr. Chandra Gulhati, editor of the Monthly Index of Medical Specialties, an Indian medical journal. Payments are allowed, but, “It should never be so much that it works as an inducement,”
Indian government figures show that more than 1,500 people have died during clinical drug trials, but it is not known how many would have died anyway if untreated. Last year foreign drug companies paid an average of about $4,800 to relatives of 22 Indians who died during or after drug trials. This is a fraction of what payouts would have been had the deaths happened in the United States.

Federal Prosecutors Work without Pay


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky
 
Washington D.C. - Tight on money but loaded with cases to prosecute, the U.S. Attorney’s office in Kansas City has been using unpaid attorneys fresh out of law school to help out.
 
According to The Kansas City Star, U.S. Attorney Beth Phillips implemented the program because of a hiring freeze that prevented her from adding any more salaried positions to her staff.
 
With unemployment among lawyers at about 5% in Missouri, and underemployment among young lawyers close to 30%, Ryan Hershberger decided to spend a year serving as a special assistant U.S. Attorney without getting paid in order to gain valuable career experience.
 
A member of the narcotics unit, Hershberger has handled an eight-person drug conspiracy case, while another unpaid special assistant has indicted more than two dozen gun defendants as part of her work for the violent-crimes strike force.
 
What is happening in Kansas is part of a larger trend across the nation. Unpaid lawyers are known as “Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys (SAUSA).” A typical call for unpaid attorneys reads, “The Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut is seeking applications from attorneys who are willing to accept an unpaid temporary position that offers a valuable opportunity to gain exposure to the office while also obtaining litigation experience and conducting trials.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Georgia Law Would Outlaw Picketing Homes of Corporate Executives


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky
 
Georgia - Coming only days after a protest outside a major telecommunications company, Republican lawmakers in Georgia have introduced a bill that would subject non-violent demonstrators involved in a labor dispute to heavy fines and felony convictions.
 
If SB 469 passes, picketing outside the homes of company executives would be forbidden. The bill’s wording defends the executives’ right to “quiet enjoyment.” Protesters also could face fines and felony charges if they demonstrate outside businesses that have won court rulings ordering the sit-ins to stop.
 
The legislation was introduced on February 21, only eight days after a demonstration inside AT&T’s headquarters in Atlanta, where 12 people were arrested for criminal trespass, which currently is a misdemeanor. Since the arrests, Occupy Atlanta and union groups have camped out in front of the building.
 
SB 469 was introduced by four Republican state senators, Don Balfour, Bill Hamrick, Bill Cowsert and Ross Tolleson, who are members of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). Funded by corporations, ALEC creates model bills for sympathetic state legislators, including proposed laws they fight labor unions. ALEC also drafted Arizona’s controversial anti-immigration bill as a way of helping one of members, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation’s largest private prison company.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Man Denied Liver Transplant for Using Prescribed Marijuana: “Probably Too Late for Me”


By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Los Angeles - Norman B. Smith, the 63-year-old cancer patient at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles who was denied a liver transplant because he used medical marijuana, says in a new interview that it’s probably too late for him to make a recovery even if he could get the surgery he needs.
 
Diagnosed three years ago with inoperable liver cancer, Smith was prescribed medical marijuana by Cedars-Sinai oncologist Steven Miles to help his patient deal with the effects of chemotherapy. Then Smith became eligible for a liver transplant, but was removed from the list after testing positive for marijuana.
 
Hospital officials insisted that Smith stop using marijuana for at least six months, undergo random drug testing, and attend weekly Alcoholics Anonymous classes before they will consider putting him back on the list. They say the policy has nothing to do with morality and is a decision based on the health of the patient.
 
Smith says he’s frustrated with the policy, but is resigned to the fact that he may have missed his chance at getting a new liver. “It’s probably too late for me,” Smith told Reason TV, “but I hope it makes it easier for the next guy…and there are plenty of us out there.”
 
Steph Sherer, executive director of Americans for Safe Access, says she knows of a dozen patients who have died because of the same denial of a transplant.

Friday, February 24, 2012

Exxon Sues for Return of Document It Gave Law Firm by Mistake


By David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - ExxonMobil is suing to recover a document it accidentally gave to attorneys of plaintiffs who are battling the oil company in court over environmental-related injuries. ExxonMobil wants the information returned because it supposedly contains evidence that the corporation deliberately withheld air sample data.
 
Over the past decade, ExxonMobil has been sued by thousands of people who claim that they or deceased members of their family were harmed by exposure to radioactive materials that accumulated in pipes used in the production of oil. In March 2010, a jury in New Orleans ruled that 16 former employees of Intracoastal Tubular Services (ITCO) who had cleaned the pipes without being warned they were dangerous deserved compensation for increased risk of cancer. Exxon had previously been forced to compensate the owners of the property where the pipes were cleaned. One of the property owners happened to be a retired state judge, Joseph Grefer. When the state 4th Circuit Court of Appeal upheld that judgment, the justices called Exxon’s behavior “reprehensible.”
 
On August 28, 2008, Exxon inadvertently turned over a 1988 memorandum from Exxon attorney Rosemary Stein regarding the results of air sample tests performed by an ExxonMobil industrial hygienist on an experimental pipe cleaning unit. The oil giant is trying to stop the document from being used in a punitive damage claims trial due to commence on March 5.
 
The attorneys being sued after refusing to return the paperwork are Timothy Falcon and Jeremiah Sprague of the Falcon Law Firm, and attorney Frank M. Buck Jr. The Falcon firm was the one that received the information by mistake, and then shared it with Buck.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Thousands Die of Mystery Illness; Work-Related Dehydration Suspected

By Noel Brinkerhoff

From AllGov


Thousands of workers in Central America are dying from kidney disease that has turned into an epidemic, according to health experts.
 
More than 24,000 people in El Salvador and Nicaragua have died since 2000 from kidney failure, which usually occurs in patients with diabetes and high-blood pressure. But the patients for the most part don’t suffer from these disorders.
 
Some people have blamed the problem on the agricultural chemicals used on sugar cane plantations, where many of the victims have worked. But many others have toiled in mines and other manual labor occupations, leading others to speculate that repeated bouts of extreme dehydration are causing the workers’ kidneys to shut down.
 
While the majority of the cases have been identified in Nicaragua and El Salvador, the condition has appeared as far south as Panama and as far north as Mexico.

42% of Women Die Within a Year of a Heart Attack, but Only 24% of Men


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky

From AllGov
 
Women are less likely than men to survive a heart attack, according to recent statistics. A study found that 42% of women who have heart attacks die within one year compared with 24% of men.
 
Researchers attribute the discrepancy in heart attack survivals to a variety of possible factors. For one, women tend to develop heart disease about 10 years later in life than men, and they are more likely to have coexisting chronic conditions, such as breast cancer involving chemotherapy that may affect some women who have heart attacks. Also, women may not be diagnosed or treated as aggressively as men for their heart problems.
 
A 2004 study of 5,887 people who made 911 calls found that, on average, women arrived at the hospital 2.3 minutes slower than men. Another study, published in the Journal of Stroke and Cardiovascular Diseases, concluded that “female and black stroke patients are less likely than others to receive care to prevent subsequent strokes.”
 
Cardiovascular disease is the number one killer of women in the United States, with about 50% of female mortalities attributed to either heart attack or stroke.

Monday, February 20, 2012

San Francisco Sues U.S. Government Over Deadly Pipeline Explosion


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky 
 
San Francisco - The U.S. Department of Transportation and one of its agencies is being sued by the city of San Francisco for the deadly gas pipeline explosion that occurred two years ago.
 
According to its lawsuit, the city claims the department’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) “has been shirking its duty for over a decade, if not longer” and has failed to properly maintain national safety standards and adequate oversight of pipelines. The PHMSA is also accused of not ensuring that pipelines in the state complied with federal safety standards under the Pipeline Safety Act.
 
San Francisco authorities accuse PHMSA of creating “a regulatory scheme that improperly delegates to gas pipeline operators responsibility for the safe operation and maintenance of gas pipeline facilities.”
  
The Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) pipeline explosion occurred in San Bruno, where eight people were killed on September 9, 2010, and destroyed more than 100 homes. The lawsuit also cites another deadly PG&E natural gas line explosion in Rancho Cordova in 2008 and a non-lethal explosion in Cupertino in 2011.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

5,000 Homeless Americans Live in Tent Cities


By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - While the U.S. unemployment rate has improved slightly in recent months, the rosy news of better times ahead contrasts with the difficult reality still haunting many Americans, especially for those living in tents to survive.
 
It is estimated that at least 5,000 individuals today call “tent cities” their home. These makeshift, and unhealthy, settlements have sprung up in more than 50 cities, including Portland, Oregon; Lakewood, New Jersey; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Pinellas Park, Florida; and Bakersfield, California.
 
Some of the tent cities house a few dozen, while others provide shelter for as many as 300. Many are supported by local churches while others face eviction because of safety code violations.
 
The conditions of the encampment in Ann Arbor have been described as “unhygienic." There are no toilets and electricity is only available in the one communal tent where the campers huddle around a wood stove for warmth in the heart of winter,” according to the BBC News.

Friday, February 10, 2012

TV and Radio Networks Fight Public Disclosure of Income from Political Ads

By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - An effort by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create more transparency for political advertisements is being opposed by television and radio networks.
 
Under current law, broadcasters must maintain a “public inspection file” that the public can review in person to learn, among other things, who is buying airtime for political ads.
 
The FCC now wants to require TV and radio stations to make these files available online so citizens can obtain the information without having to travel to the stations.
 
But organizations like the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) object to the new rule, claiming the posting of the file content on websites would prove to be “a new burden” and, in a particularly lame argument, would “provide no clear new benefit to the public.”
 
Between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2011, the NAB and its employees donated $549,450 to the campaigns of members of the U.S. House of Representatives and, over the past six years, $383,423 to members of the U.S. Senate.

FBI Warns that People Who Use AOL at Internet Cafés Could be Terrorists


By Noel Brinkerhoff, David Wallechinsky
 
United States - America Online users beware: If you access your AOL account from a computer at an Internet café, your name may wind up on a terrorist-watch list.
 
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), AOL users at public computer venues are just one possible type of suspicious person that business owners need to keep tabs on.
 
The FBI has been distributing flyers to paintball centers, banks, dive shops and even tattoo shops to educate them on how to spot potential terrorist activities.
 
In addition to noting who is accessing AOL, Internet café owners should watch out for and report customers who always pay for their service with cash, attempt to shield their screen from other people in the room, communicate through video games or use VOIP, all of which are signs of a would-be terrorist, says the FBI.
 
The flyers do remind business owners and their employees that “It is important to remember that just because someone’s speech, actions, beliefs, appearance, or way of life is different; it does not mean that he or she is suspicious.”

Why are Americans Arrested for Videotaping Police in Public Places?


By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - Recording police officers while making arrests has resulted in numerous other arrests … of those daring to tape such actions.
 
In October 2007 attorney Simon Glik was arrested by Boston police after he used his cell phone to capture the arrest of young man who was punched by an officer. Claiming the audio recording of the arrest violated the law, police took Glik to jail. On January 5 of this year—more than four years later—the Boston Police Department finally sent Glik a letter admitting that its officers are acted unlawfully when they arrested him.
 
In Rochester, New York, last year, Emily Good was arrested after videotaping—from her own front yard—the arrest of a man at a traffic stop. The arresting officer, Mario Masic, accused Good of being “anti-police” after she refused to stop recording the arrest. The charge against Good was later dropped.
 
In Illinois, a 1960s-era law is coming under scrutiny as Chicago prepares to host the G8 and NATO summits, which are expected to attract large numbers of protesters and journalists. As currently written, the state law allows police to arrest any citizen on felony charges for recording the conversations of police without their consent.
 
The ACLU argues that the Illinois Eavesdropping Act is out of date and over the top.
 
One state lawmaker, Democratic Representative Elaine Nekritz, has proposed an amendment that would allow for the recording of police on duty in public places.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Obama Administration Making it Harder for Military Families to Sue for Medical Malpractice


By Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky
 
United States - In defending the U.S. military’s medical system in court, the U.S. Department of Justice is arguing that service personnel and their families are not allowed to sue for medical malpractice regardless of the circumstance.
 
As a general rule, military members are barred from taking the government to court, which has been established in several court cases, in particular the 1950 Supreme Court decision in Feres v. United States. But now government lawyers are trying to expand the scope of Feres to make it impossible for families of soldiers to sue for medical malpractice, if at the time of the bad care the service member was on active duty.
 
“This is a whopper of a theory and it immediately raised the hackles of attorneys who practice in this field,” wrote Andrew Cohen for The Atlantic. “Now, all of sudden, family members of military personnel can't sue the U.S. for negligence because their loved ones are on active duty?”
 
Eugene Fidell, an expert in military law at Yale University told the Military Times that the Feres Doctrine was not intended to protect military hospitals sued by civilians. “If the government can plausibly take a position like this, something is basically wrong,” said Fidell. “The outcome the government is arguing for is intolerable. If the government wins this motion, Congress has to step in.”

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Insecticides May Be Linked to Bee Die-offs: Purdue University


By David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - Agricultural chemicals may be partly responsible for the massive die-off of honeybees in the U.S., according to researchers at Purdue University. Entomologists have found the presence of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are used on corn and soybean seeds and are known to be “highly toxic to bees; we found them in each sample of dead and dying bees,” Christian Krupke, associate professor of entomology, told Purdue Daily. Except for organically grown crops, almost all corn seeds planted in the United States are coated with neonicotinoid insecticides, leading to exposure to honeybees foraging near corn fields.
 
Honeybees pollinate about 30% of all food consumed and contribute $15-20 billion a year in agriculture revenue for the U.S. The U.S. is currently losing about one-third of its honeybee hives each year. Some researchers (and pesticide manufacturers, such as Bayer) have maintained that the die-offs have been caused not by pesticides, but by viruses and fungi.

FBI to Create Spy System: AP


By David Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff
 
United States - The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is creating a spy system that will allow it to monitor social media websites, including Facebook and Twitter.
 
FBI analysts are hoping to pick up tips about future terrorist threats by examining “publicly available” material from Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites, as well as national and local television news, including Fox News, CNN and MSNBC. The bureau intends to zero in on keywords relating to terrorism, surveillance operations, online crime and other criminal matters. It also hopes to better “track hurricane paths and timelines for landfall and other natural disasters.”
 
Applicants who believe they can provide the system the FBI is seeking must be able to view tweets in at least 12 languages and translate them into English. They must also have the “Ability to display video feeds from traffic cameras to monitor traffic patterns, obstructions, bottle necks, protestors, and flash mobs.”
 
The Central Intelligence Agency has already been spying on Facebook and Twitter, as well as news outlets, as part of its effort to glean intelligence on upcoming threats or overseas upheaval, such as revolutions, before they begin. Doug Naquin, director of the CIA’s Open Source Center, told the Associated Press that the best analysts are those who, like the heroine of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, know “how to find stuff other people don’t know exists.”

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Why Does the FBI Treat Videotaping Corporate Animal Abuse As Terrorism?

By Noel Brinkerhoff
 
Activists who expose animal abuses on factory farms face the risk of being prosecuted as domestic terrorists.
 
Using the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), which was signed into law by President George W. Bush in November 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has kept files on animal rights activists who have recorded incidents of cruelty towards animals on large farming operations.  Now, though, a bureau task force has even recommended trying these individuals as terrorism suspects.
 
Activist Ryan Shapiro, who used the Freedom of Information Act to discover what the FBI was up to, told the Los Angeles Times that “it’s simply outrageous to consider civil disobedience as terrorism.”
 
“Civil disobedience” he added, “has a long and proud place in our nation’s history, from Martin Luther King to Occupy Wall Street, and the AETA takes that kind of advocacy that we celebrate from the civil rights movement and turns it into a terrorist event.”
 
The Center for Constitutional Rights has filed a lawsuit challenging the AETA as unconstitutional, claiming the law is too vague and is discouraging political activism.